New To DesiZip?
  Forgot Password?
Become DESIZIP Agent & Make More Money. Everything For FREE!!!
                                               
Home Classifieds Matrimonial News Jobs Gallery Events Properties Yellow Pages Forum Agents
          Country News  |  State News  |  City News  |  Zip News  |  News By Media  |  News In Picture  |  Search
 
  By Category
 
 
Budget
Cricket
Culture
Entertainment
Health
Money
Others
Politics
Sports
Technology
Travel
Weather
Events
 
  India On Media
 
 
 
BBC
Bloomberg
Reuters
 
Politics News

Prison Beard Ban Violates Muslim
Prison Beard Ban Violates Muslim Religious Rights, Supreme Court Rules
 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , 21-January-2015  12:32:8 PM
The Supreme Court on Tuesday unanimously ruled that Arkansas corrections officials had violated the religious liberty rights of Muslim inmates by forbidding them to grow beards.

The case concerned Gregory H. Holt, who is serving a life sentence for burglary and domestic battery. Holt, also known as Abdul Maalik Muhammad, sought to grow a half-inch beard.

More than 40 state prison systems allow such short beards. Most allow longer ones. The exceptions, according to Holt's brief, are Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia.

In Arkansas, prison regulations allow "neatly trimmed" mustaches, along with quarter-inch beards for inmates with dermatologic problems, but ban beards in other cases.

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in St. Louis, ruled that the state's security concerns were sufficient to prohibit Holt from growing a beard. Holt then filed a handwritten petition asking the justices to hear his case, pointing out that other courts had struck down policies banning beards in prisons.

RelatedPrisoner Can Grow His Beard: US Supreme Court

Cisco Systems Sues Rival for Infringement of Network Patents

Indian-American's TV-Over-Internet Service Aereo Files For Bankruptcy

In deciding the case, the justices applied the same legal test that they used in June in the Hobby Lobby case, which allowed some corporations run on religious principles to refuse to pay for contraception coverage for their female workers.

The test, set out in federal statutes, first considers whether the challenged government regulation places a substantial burden on religious practices. If it does, the test requires the government to show that it had a compelling reason for the regulation and no better way to achieve it.

From : http://www.ndtv.com  

Posted By : Desi

ADVERTISEMENTS

Free offer!!! Become an administrator for your zip home page, "Post" local news (local to your postcode)& pictures, "Post" advertisement banners from local companies. Make Extra money.

 
 
Home  |  Classifieds  |  Matrimonial  |  Yellow Pages  |  Jobs  |  Resumes  |  Events  |  Properties  |  Movies
Forum  |  About Us  |  Contact Us  |  Feedback  |  Help  |  Useful Links |  Advertise With Us  |  Site Map
                  See Terms and Conditions,
                  © 2016-2017 Copyright @ Desizip, All Rights Reserved.