|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
By Category |
 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
| |
India On Media |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Politics
News |
|
| Supreme Court rejects plea ........ |
| Babri Masjid verdict: Supreme Court rejects plea for deferment
|
| INDIA
, 28-September-2010
4:52:42 AM |
| A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court, headed by the Chief Justice of India, has cleared the way for the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court to pronounce verdict on the Ayodhya title suit case.
The apex court has rejected a plea to defer verdict on the Ayodhya land dispute case.
Last week, on September 23, a Supreme Court interim order had restrained the Allahabad High Court from pronouncing the verdict in the four title suits. The verdict of the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court was to have been delivered a day later.
A petition filed before the Supreme Court by retired bureaucrat Ramesh Chand Tripathi had sought that the verdict be deferred to allow the contesting parties to arrive at some sort of settlement.
But the Central Board of Wakfs, the All-India Muslim Personal Law Board and the All-India Hindu Maha Sabha had pleaded for vacating the stay and allowing the High Court to pronounce the verdict.
"The difference between Mandir group and Masjid group are so diverse. That's why we want the judgement to be pronounced," said Anoop Chaudhri, senior lawyer for Sunni Central Board of Waqf Board, UP.
There are 27 respondents in the case.
The Nirmohi Akhara, a key party in the suit, said it would request the Supreme Court to ask for the verdict to be deferred for three months to allow for a solution through negotiations.
For the first time the Centre was also a party to the case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADVERTISEMENTS
Free offer!!! Become an administrator for your zip home page, "Post" local news (local to your postcode)& pictures, "Post" advertisement banners from local companies. Make Extra money.
|
 |
 |
|
|
| |
|
