New To DesiZip?
  Forgot Password?
Become DESIZIP Agent & Make More Money. Everything For FREE!!!
                                               
Home Classifieds Matrimonial News Jobs Gallery Events Properties Yellow Pages Forum Agents
          Country News  |  State News  |  City News  |  Zip News  |  News By Media  |  News In Picture  |  Search
 
  By Category
 
 
Budget
Cricket
Culture
Entertainment
Health
Money
Others
Politics
Sports
Technology
Travel
Weather
Events
 
  India On Media
 
 
 
BBC
Bloomberg
Reuters
 
Politics News

Freedom of Expression and the Inter
Freedom of Expression and the Internet: Crucial Supreme Court Verdict on Tuesday
 INDIA , 23-March-2015  11:28:1 AM
The Supreme Court will on Tuesday pronounce verdict on a batch of petitions challenging the validity of section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, which the petitioners described as vague and ambiguous and beyond the ambit of article 19 of the Constitution guaranteeing freedom of speech.

The bench of Justice J Chelameswar and Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman will pronounce the verdict which was reserved on February 26, upon the conclusion of the arguments by the petitioners and the central government.

Justice Nariman would pronounce the verdict for the bench.

RelatedSupreme Court to Examine Plea That Says Christian Divorce Law Discriminatory

Madhya Pradesh Exam Scam: Supreme Court Gives 4 Month Extension To Conclude Investigation

Sahara Gets Final Chance to Raise Funds Against Properties

The challenge to the validity of section 66A was raised by Shreya Singhal, following the arrest of two girls for posting comments critical of the Mumbai bandh in the wake of the death of Shiv Sena supremo Bal Thackeray.

The hearing saw NGOs Common Cause, People Union for Civil Liberty and individuals including self-exiled Bangladeshi writer Taslima Nasreen joining the challenge which saw a repeat hearing after an earlier hearing by a bench of Justice J Chelameswar and Justice SA Bobde remained inconclusive.

Broadly, the contention by most of the petitioners was that section 66A was vague which gave ample scope for an arbitrary interpretation and misuse of the provision by police.

Section 66A reads: "Any person who sends by any means of a computer resource any information that is grossly offensive or has a menacing character; or any information which he knows to be false, but for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and with fine."

From : http://www.ndtv.com  

Posted By : DesiZip.com

ADVERTISEMENTS

Free offer!!! Become an administrator for your zip home page, "Post" local news (local to your postcode)& pictures, "Post" advertisement banners from local companies. Make Extra money.

 
 
Home  |  Classifieds  |  Matrimonial  |  Yellow Pages  |  Jobs  |  Resumes  |  Events  |  Properties  |  Movies
Forum  |  About Us  |  Contact Us  |  Feedback  |  Help  |  Useful Links |  Advertise With Us  |  Site Map
                  See Terms and Conditions,
                  © 2016-2017 Copyright @ Desizip, All Rights Reserved.