New To DesiZip?
  Forgot Password?
Become DESIZIP Agent & Make More Money. Everything For FREE!!!
                                               
Home Classifieds Matrimonial News Jobs Gallery Events Properties Yellow Pages Forum Agents
          Country News  |  State News  |  City News  |  Zip News  |  News By Media  |  News In Picture  |  Search
 
  By Category
 
 
Budget
Cricket
Culture
Entertainment
Health
Money
Others
Politics
Sports
Technology
Travel
Weather
Events
 
  India On Media
 
 
 
BBC
Bloomberg
Reuters
 
Politics News

Jayalalithaa's Acquittal Based
Jayalalithaa's Acquittal Based on Deeply Flawed Math, Says Prosecutor
 INDIA , 12-May-2015  13:32:18 PM
The decision to declare J Jayalalithaa not guilty in a corruption case may have been based on deeply flawed math, the prosecutor has alleged.

"In terms of percentage there is a glaring arithmetical error," said public prosecutor BV Acharya.

Yesterday, the Karnataka High Court said that the politician had been incorrectly charged with accumulating wealth disproportionate to her known sources of income during her first term as Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu. She had said her monthly salary was just a rupee. The prosecution said that in five years, her assets including property and jewelry added up to 66 crores.

But the judge said that the prosecution had mixed up assets of firms owned by her with her personal wealth. Justice CR Kumaraswamy found that Ms Jayalalithaa's illegal or unaccounted wealth was about 8% of her income - which was "relatively small" and "within the permissible limit of 10 per cent".

The prosecution claims that the rise in her illegal wealth was miscalculated and far exceeds the limit.

Mr Acharya said according to page 852 of the Karnataka High Court judgement, the former Tamil Nadu chief minister's loans add up to almost Rs. 11 crore, while the judge calculated her borrowings at 24 crores - around 13 crores more.

Jayalalithaa's disproportionate assets, therefore, add up to around Rs. 16 crore and not Rs. 3 crore.

"So her assets are disproportionate by 76% and not 8.12 (as stated by the judge). Since the glaring mistake has come to our notice only now, we are considering all options available," said Mr Acharya, who fought the case on behalf of the government of Karnataka, which is where the trial was shifted from Tamil Nadu in 2003 to ensure it would not be impacted by the politics of Ms Jayalalithaa's home state.

From : http://www.ndtv.com  

Posted By : DesiZip.com

ADVERTISEMENTS

Free offer!!! Become an administrator for your zip home page, "Post" local news (local to your postcode)& pictures, "Post" advertisement banners from local companies. Make Extra money.

 
 
Home  |  Classifieds  |  Matrimonial  |  Yellow Pages  |  Jobs  |  Resumes  |  Events  |  Properties  |  Movies
Forum  |  About Us  |  Contact Us  |  Feedback  |  Help  |  Useful Links |  Advertise With Us  |  Site Map
                  See Terms and Conditions,
                  © 2016-2017 Copyright @ Desizip, All Rights Reserved.